Maximalminimalism encounters polarity into a neat union in entangling equilibrium and culmination of simplicity and complexity.
How minimal can a concept be and still offer maximal expression? How much simplification can be used for still conveying the complexity of the portrayed issue?
How much generalization of the big picture can still lead to exact specialization of the details?
The maximal minimization of details in order to capture the essence of the main concept is the core of the philosophy of reductionism.
How many details can be erased without significantly changing the overall picture?